Rubrics and Forms
Quality Professional Training

Daily Lesson Plan Page 1

Critical Thinking Tests

New Evaluation Tools (1st Page)

English Sites(1)

Grammar, Dictionaries, ELT Sites

Photo Activities

Diagnostic Tests

Blended Learning and links

Slide Show

Guest Book

12th Grade Resources

Rubrics and Forms

Tenth Grade Analysis Page 1

Online Training for New Teachers

Grade 11 Content Analysis

12th Grade Remedial Resources

Powerpoint, Video, Audio, Clip Art, e-Libraries

Placement Tests

Learning StylesTests

Ask an Expert

12th Grade Training

Blended Learning Free Computer Skills and Programs

START HERE! How Our Reflective Blended Training Works

Free 'Electronic' Teaching Managment

Learning Difficulties Tests, Teaching

Action Pack, Grade 2 Training (1st Page)

Action Pack, Grade 8 Training (1st page)

Inquiry, Critical Thinking, Task-based, Problem-based Learning, constructivism (Methods 1)

Action Pack 8 Training (2nd page)

Action Pack 2 Training (2nd Page)

12th Grade Content Analysis

12th Grade Standards

Action Pack 8, Grade 8 Training (3rd Page)

Free Hardware/Software Technical Assistance

New Evaluation Tools (3rd Page)

Free Icebreakers for Classroom Use

New Evaluation Tools (2nd Page)

Evaluation (4th Page) Organizing Your GradeBook

Semester Plan

New Evaluation Authentic Assessment(5th Page)

Total Physical Response (Methods 2)

Daily Lesson Plan Page 2

Lesson Planning Page 3 (Strategies)

Outcomes, General and Specific Page 1

Outcomes, General and Specific Page 2

Outcomes, General and Specific Page 3

Exemplar of Performance-based Assessment

Remedial Activities Page 2

8th Grade Content Analysis page 3

12th Grade Audio Vocational Literature

CRITICAL THINKING 2

Free AntiVirus Scan

Text to Speech/ Speech to Text

Dear Teacher

Here you'll find all sorts of Rubrics and forms needed for organizing and assessing Language tasks.

What is a rubric?

Rubrics are tables of criteria that describe

the level of performance which is expected of students at

several degrees of quality. The degrees of quality can be

written as different ratings (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Needs

Improvement) or as numerical points on a scale ( 5, 4, 3, 2, 1).

The sum of the points can be used to determine a grade for or

an evaluation of the student's performance.

http://www.theeducatorsnetwork.com/utt/rubricgeneral.htm

A very large collection of rubrics that cover a wide

 range of subjects

http://www.shambles.net/pages/staff/rubrics/

Here you will find a group of Web sites that include

long lists of rubrics and generators of rubrics that guide you

through the process of creating a variety of assessment

and evaluation tools.

http://www.fcps.k12.va.us/DIS/OHSICS/forlang/PALS/rubrics/index.htm

Fairfax County Public Schools - PALS:

Performance Assessment for Language Students:

Rubrics

http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/assess.html#rubrics

"Now that we are using the Internet in the classroom

to support instruction, it is important the area of

assessment be addressed. One usable method for

teachers is to provide a rubric for student use and

for both formative and summative assessment purposes.

Another is to provide some type of graphic organizer.

Below you will find a collection of assessment rubrics

and graphic organizers that may be helpful to you as

you design your own."

Here you will find one of the largest groups of Web

Sites that include lists of rubrics and generators of

rubrics that  guide you through the process of creating

a variety of assessment and evaluation tools.


WRITING MARKING SCALE 2006

(Please check for evidence of WRITING  PROCESS SEQUENCES)

IDEAS

STRUCTURE

SCALE

Very good Ideas-Excellent

Very good Str.-Excellent

8-10

Good Ideas

Good Str.

7-8

Bad Ideas

Good Str.

6-7

Good Ideas

Bad str.

5-6

FAIL/   Partial Ideas

Poor Str.

4

Very Poor Ideas

Poor Str.

3-4

 Very poor but with some relevant Ideas

Very poor Str.

2-3

Title/ Letter layout

One/ two good sentences

1

Irrelevant Ideas

Irrelevant Str.

0

CRITERION/

LEVEL

CONTENT

ORGANIZATION AND MECHANICS

VOCABULARY

LANGUAGE USE

VERY GOOD

8-10

3

2

2

2-3

GOOD 7-8

2

1-2

2

2

ACCEPTABLE

6-7

2

1

2

1-2

Relatively acceptable

6-5

1/2

1

1

1-2

(FAIL) 4

1

1

1

1

VERY POOR

3

1-2

0

1

1

Very poor but with some relevant ideas

2-3

            1

             0

           0-1

             1

Irrelevant  0

0

0

0

0

CRITERION/

LEVEL

CONTENT

ORGANIZATION AND MECHANICS

VOCABULARY

LANGUAGE USE

VERY GOOD

-Complete realization of the task

-Relevant

-Communicative

-well-organized

-clear, coherent

-mechanics of writing  are well-observed

-demonstrate a wide range of vocabulary

-effective use of word choice, idioms…etc.

-mostly accurate

-few mistakes

-communication isn’t impeded

GOOD

-Noticeable fluency

-mostly relevant

-message can be understood

-organized

-ideas are partially clear and coherent

-shows a reasonable use of writing mechanics

-reasonable use of vocabulary to convey a message

-occasional errors

-no global errors

- a good use of sentence construction

ACCEPTABLE

-no complete realization of task

-lack of ideas

-not communicative but meaning is conveyed

-loosely organized

-no noticeable coherence

-frequent errors in the mechanics

-limited range of vocabulary

-no effective use of vocabulary to convey a message

-frequent grammatical errors

-use of one straight pattern

POOR

(+FAIL)

-irrelevant ideas

-not communicative

-no conveyed message

-disconnected ideas

-not organized

-no use of writing mechanics

-little use of vocabulary

-vocabulary are insufficient to convey meaning

-global grammatical errors

-no mastery of sentence structure

School-based assessment

The English Language Teacher is going to give an
Achievement Test in (Writing), and he is going to
 use the rubric to assess the compositions.               
  Writing Rubric

Categories

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Reasoning

The student uses:

Complexity of ideas

- Number and relevance of supporting fact and details.

well developed interesting ideas.

 Supporting detail that clarify and enhance the topic.

-Developed connected ideas.

- Sufficient supporting details

- Simple connected ideas.

- Some supporting details, but not enough

- Few simple ideas not connected.

- Very few supporting details

Convention

The student:

Grammar.

 Correctly uses all of the conventions.

- Correctly uses most of the conventions.

- Correctly uses some of the conventions.

- Correctly uses very few of the conventions

Spelling.

- Spells most words accurately.

- Uses phonetic spelling only for more difficult words.

- Uses phonetic and conventional spelling for familiar words.

- Shows some evidence of spelling strategies.

Punctuation

- Makes almost no errors.

- Makes few errors.

- Makes some errors

- Makes many errors.

 =======================================================

For School-based Assessment

 The English Language Teacher is going to give Achievement Test in

 (  Reading Comprehension), but he is not going to mark it; instead,

he is going to ask the learners to use the rubric to assess themselves:                   

Rubric for Reading Comprehension

            Criteria

PERFORMANCE  LEVEL

LEVEL A

LEVEL B

LEVEL C

LEVEL D

Identifies main points

Identifies all main points

Identifies most main points

Identifies some main points

Identifies none of the

 main points

Extracts specific information

Extracts all items

Extracts most items

 Extracts some items

Extracts none of the items

Expresses opinion

Original

Common

Not Clear

Not

 mentioned

Tells the theme/gist

Precise and accurate

Precise but not accurate

Relevant

Wrong

============================================================

Suggested Speaking Rubric

Range

Fluency

(6 marks )

Accuracy and Range

 ( 7 marks )

Interactive communication

 (7 marks)

Task achievement

16-20

Coherent spoken inter action with speed appropriate to the tasks , and few intrusive hesitations

-Evidence a wide range of structure and vocabulary in all contexts

competent handling of most English pronunciation features

Few minor grammatical and lexical  errors 

The candidate contributes  fully and effectively through out the interaction .

The candidate uses a wide range of functions and properties.

 Responses are seldom short with  attempt at elaboration .

The candidate can under stand immediately almost every thing said to her | him .

The interlocutor has to provide only minimal help .

The interlocutor can speak at his /her normal speed. 

The tasks are dealt with fully and effectively

11-15

Occasional hesitations but not such as to strain the listener or impede communication

Evidence of an appropriate range of structures and vocabulary

Minor difficulties with several pronunciation features.

  Some grammatical and lexical errors .

The candidate contributes with ease for most of the inter action.

The candidate uses many functions appropriately.

The  candidate sometimes takes part in extended face to face communication .

Responses are sometimes short with attempts at  elaboration

The candidate can largely understand what is said to himher.

The interlocutor occasionally provides some help.

The interlocutor can speak at his her normal speed for most of the interaction.  

The tasks are dealt with efficiently but treatment maybe fragmented .

6-10

Fairly frequent and noticeable hesitations

- Communication is achieved , but strains the listener at times.

Evidence of an appropriate range of structures and vocabulary.

Minor difficulties with several English pronunciation features.

Some grammatical and lexical errors.

The candidate contributes effectively for much of the interaction but with intrusive difficulties

The cadidate uses some functions appropriately .

The candidate can  take part  in short face to face conversations

Responses are often short without attempt at elaboration . 

With  the help provided the candidate can understand most of what is said to himher

The interlocutor often provides a great deal of help .

The interlocutor sometimes speaks slowly to make him her self  understood

The tasks are dealt with in limited manner .

1-5

Disconnected speech or frequent hesitation impede communication and constantly strain the listener 

-Evidence that range of structures and vocabulary impedes communication of the essential message .

Wide spread difficulties with English pronunciation features .

Frequent basic errors.

Difficulty in maintaining contributions through out the interaction .

The candidate uses few functions appropriately

The candidate can occasionally take part in short face to face conversions.

Responses are generally short , without attempt  at elaboration 

With the help provided the candidate can understand some of what  is said to himher .

The interlocutor often speak  slowly to make himsel/fherself understood .

Inadequate or irrelevant attempt at tasks