Here you'll find all sorts of Rubrics and forms needed for organizing and assessing Language tasks.
Rubrics are tables of criteria that describe
the level of performance which is expected of students at
several degrees of quality. The degrees of quality can be
written as different ratings (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Needs
Improvement) or as numerical points on a scale ( 5, 4, 3, 2, 1).
The sum of the points can be used to determine a grade for or
an evaluation of the student's performance.
http://www.theeducatorsnetwork.com/utt/rubricgeneral.htm
A very large collection of rubrics that cover a wide
range of subjects
http://www.shambles.net/pages/staff/rubrics/
Here you will find a group of Web sites that include
long lists of rubrics and generators of rubrics that guide you
through the process of creating a variety of assessment
and evaluation tools.
http://www.fcps.k12.va.us/DIS/OHSICS/forlang/PALS/rubrics/index.htm
Fairfax County Public Schools - PALS:
Performance Assessment for Language Students:
Rubrics
http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/assess.html#rubrics
"Now that we are using the Internet in the classroom
to support instruction, it is important the area of
assessment be addressed. One usable method for
teachers is to provide a rubric for student use and
for both formative and summative assessment purposes.
Another is to provide some type of graphic organizer.
Below you will find a collection of assessment rubrics
and graphic organizers that may be helpful to you as
you design your own."
Here you will find one of the largest groups of Web
Sites that include lists of rubrics and generators of
rubrics that guide you through the process of creating
a variety of assessment and evaluation tools.
WRITING MARKING SCALE 2006
(Please check for evidence of WRITING PROCESS SEQUENCES)
IDEAS | STRUCTURE | SCALE |
Very good Ideas-Excellent | Very good Str.-Excellent | 8-10 |
Good Ideas | Good Str. | 7-8 |
Bad Ideas | Good Str. | 6-7 |
Good Ideas | Bad str. | 5-6 |
FAIL/ Partial Ideas | Poor Str. | 4 |
Very Poor Ideas | Poor Str. | 3-4 |
Very poor but with some relevant Ideas | Very poor Str. | 2-3 |
Title/ Letter layout | One/ two good sentences | 1 |
Irrelevant Ideas | Irrelevant Str. | 0 |
|
CRITERION/ LEVEL | CONTENT | ORGANIZATION AND MECHANICS | VOCABULARY | LANGUAGE USE |
VERY GOOD8-10 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2-3 |
GOOD 7-8 | 2 | 1-2 | 2 | 2 |
ACCEPTABLE6-7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 |
Relatively acceptable6-5 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 |
(FAIL) 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
VERY POOR3 | 1-2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Very poor but with some relevant ideas 2-3 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 1 |
Irrelevant 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
CRITERION/ LEVEL | CONTENT | ORGANIZATION AND MECHANICS | VOCABULARY | LANGUAGE USE |
VERY GOOD | -Complete realization of the task -Relevant -Communicative | -well-organized -clear, coherent -mechanics of writing are well-observed | -demonstrate a wide range of vocabulary -effective use of word choice, idioms…etc. | -mostly accurate -few mistakes -communication isn’t impeded |
GOOD | -Noticeable fluency -mostly relevant -message can be understood
| -organized -ideas are partially clear and coherent -shows a reasonable use of writing mechanics | -reasonable use of vocabulary to convey a message | -occasional errors -no global errors - a good use of sentence construction |
ACCEPTABLE | -no complete realization of task -lack of ideas -not communicative but meaning is conveyed | -loosely organized -no noticeable coherence -frequent errors in the mechanics | -limited range of vocabulary -no effective use of vocabulary to convey a message | -frequent grammatical errors -use of one straight pattern |
POOR (+FAIL) | -irrelevant ideas -not communicative -no conveyed message | -disconnected ideas -not organized -no use of writing mechanics | -little use of vocabulary -vocabulary are insufficient to convey meaning | -global grammatical errors -no mastery of sentence structure |
School-based assessment
The English Language Teacher is going to give an
Achievement Test in (Writing), and he is going to
use the rubric to assess the compositions.
Writing Rubric
Categories | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 |
Reasoning | The student uses: |
Complexity of ideas - Number and relevance of supporting fact and details. | well developed interesting ideas. Supporting detail that clarify and enhance the topic. | -Developed connected ideas. - Sufficient supporting details | - Simple connected ideas. - Some supporting details, but not enough | - Few simple ideas not connected. - Very few supporting details |
Convention | The student: |
Grammar. | Correctly uses all of the conventions. | - Correctly uses most of the conventions. | - Correctly uses some of the conventions. | - Correctly uses very few of the conventions |
Spelling. | - Spells most words accurately. | - Uses phonetic spelling only for more difficult words. | - Uses phonetic and conventional spelling for familiar words. | - Shows some evidence of spelling strategies. |
Punctuation | - Makes almost no errors. | - Makes few errors. | - Makes some errors | - Makes many errors. |
=======================================================
For School-based Assessment
The English Language Teacher is going to give Achievement Test in
( Reading Comprehension), but he is not going to mark it; instead,
he is going to ask the learners to use the rubric to assess themselves:
Rubric for Reading Comprehension
Criteria | PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
LEVEL A | LEVEL B | LEVEL C | LEVEL D |
Identifies main points | Identifies all main points | Identifies most main points | Identifies some main points | Identifies none of the main points |
Extracts specific information | Extracts all items | Extracts most items | Extracts some items | Extracts none of the items |
Expresses opinion | Original | Common | Not Clear | Not mentioned |
Tells the theme/gist | Precise and accurate | Precise but not accurate | Relevant | Wrong |
============================================================
Suggested Speaking Rubric
Range | Fluency (6 marks ) | Accuracy and Range ( 7 marks ) | Interactive communication (7 marks) | Task achievement |
16-20 | Coherent spoken inter action with speed appropriate to the tasks , and few intrusive hesitations | -Evidence a wide range of structure and vocabulary in all contexts competent handling of most English pronunciation features Few minor grammatical and lexical errors | The candidate contributes fully and effectively through out the interaction . The candidate uses a wide range of functions and properties. Responses are seldom short with attempt at elaboration . The candidate can under stand immediately almost every thing said to her | him . The interlocutor has to provide only minimal help . The interlocutor can speak at his /her normal speed. | The tasks are dealt with fully and effectively |
11-15 | Occasional hesitations but not such as to strain the listener or impede communication | Evidence of an appropriate range of structures and vocabulary Minor difficulties with several pronunciation features. Some grammatical and lexical errors . | The candidate contributes with ease for most of the inter action. The candidate uses many functions appropriately. The candidate sometimes takes part in extended face to face communication . Responses are sometimes short with attempts at elaboration The candidate can largely understand what is said to himher. The interlocutor occasionally provides some help. The interlocutor can speak at his her normal speed for most of the interaction. | The tasks are dealt with efficiently but treatment maybe fragmented . |
6-10 | Fairly frequent and noticeable hesitations - Communication is achieved , but strains the listener at times. | Evidence of an appropriate range of structures and vocabulary. Minor difficulties with several English pronunciation features. Some grammatical and lexical errors. | The candidate contributes effectively for much of the interaction but with intrusive difficulties The cadidate uses some functions appropriately . The candidate can take part in short face to face conversations Responses are often short without attempt at elaboration . With the help provided the candidate can understand most of what is said to himher The interlocutor often provides a great deal of help . The interlocutor sometimes speaks slowly to make him her self understood | The tasks are dealt with in limited manner . |
1-5 | Disconnected speech or frequent hesitation impede communication and constantly strain the listener | -Evidence that range of structures and vocabulary impedes communication of the essential message . Wide spread difficulties with English pronunciation features . Frequent basic errors. | Difficulty in maintaining contributions through out the interaction . The candidate uses few functions appropriately The candidate can occasionally take part in short face to face conversions. Responses are generally short , without attempt at elaboration With the help provided the candidate can understand some of what is said to himher . The interlocutor often speak slowly to make himsel/fherself understood . | Inadequate or irrelevant attempt at tasks |